What I asked
But, as we’re talking about GenAI here, I also dropped them into ChatGPT and asked it to summarise the key themes.And honestly, it did a really good job.
The summary
"Across the responses, there’s a pretty consistent theme: hiring managers aren’t that interested in candidates who have a skillset focused only on GenAI. What they keep coming back to is strong fundamentals.
People who are solid with data, statistics, and programming, and who can actually identify problems relating to the business or customer, and then plan appropriate ways to solve those problems.
GenAI is definitely being used, but more as a tool for certain situations, scenarios, or tasks, rather than something that replaces core skills. A lot of teams said they experimented quite heavily with AI over the past 12 to 18 months, sometimes trying to force it into places where it didn’t really fit, but things have settled down now. The focus has shifted back to what actually delivers value.
The candidates that stand out tend to be the ones who have that solid technical base, but also understand the newer tools well enough to use them when it makes sense."
The Data Science Skills Employers Still
Care About In The AI Era
GenAI matters. But the people who win are the ones who pair it with strong fundamentals.
Download Your Copy
My 5 biggest takeaways
1. Fundamentals are still incredibly important
"The fundamentals are not becoming less important because of GenAI. They are becoming one of the biggest differentiators."
2. GenAI is a tool, not the job
3. The past 12 to 18 months were a bit of a scramble
"The AI conversation is moving from hype to usefulness."
4. Knowing when not to use AI is becoming a real skill
5. Balanced skillsets are winning
What this means if you want to move into Data Science, Analytics, or AI
"The key is not to learn everything. It is to learn the right things, in the right order, and understand how they fit together."
